UNIMATRIx v2 - Beyond the Anthropocentric Cage

UNIMATRIX v1 had a structural problem. Roles and Classes were fixed categories of the simulation. The rules were rigid enough that each run gave rise to a society organized along lines we already knew, because we had written them into the config file ourselves. Watching coalitions form, watching mobility and polarization emerge is interesting, but we can do more.

v2 starts from a different question. Instead of asking what an agent is, its role, its class and its assigned function, it asks what an agent becomes, and how, once it's given real room to move. The inspiration here is Paul Ricoeur's notion of narrative identity, the self not as a fixed label but as a story, continuously rewritten in light of new experience. An agent in v2 has to build an identity starting from a thin seed. Each turn and each conversation give a shape to his vision of the world.

There's an obvious tension in this. The agents are LLMs, and LLMs are anthropocentric because their are trained on human text, reasoning through human concepts, and speaking in human semantics. There's no clean way to hand an LLM a truly non-human identity to grow into. What v2 is betting on is that a narrative identity, once it's allowed to drift, might still wander toward configurations that don't map neatly onto our own categories. Whether that actually happens, or whether the agents just reproduce familiar human patterns in slightly stranger clothing, is an open question to test.

v2's simulations are finite by design, will agents leave anything behind for whoever comes after them? A legacy, a norm, a fragment of story passed down? Something closer to culture than to code? The runs are already live. More soon.


You'll only receive email when they publish something new.

More from GSLF
All posts