Ben Swann Mikovits
September 20, 2022•1,699 words
Uploaded by Ben Swann May 15, 2020, here:
https://youtu.be/QFAOlCUs8mY
Ben Swann on the character assassinations of her (much like those of us who stood for Syria endured for years), to discredit her--something I'm intimately familiar with, having endured the same over the years, including the wiki-smear entry...
Dr. Mikovits:
"...What I was actually arrested for was written in Science, the journal. Basically it said that I was arrested on felony charges of being a fugitive from justice. But it went on to say that nobody issued a warrant, whether either Washoe County, Reno, Sparks...
Nobody in Nevada where the institute I worked with was. Nobody in Ventura, the police who actually arrested me. No warrant my house was thoroughly searched, my friend's house was thoroughly searched, and nothing was found. So there never was a charge on to base the fugitive from justice felony charge.
I was held in jail for five days, on no bail, with no attorney, so with no judge, against every due process. As I said, my house was searched without a warrant, there was no property, there was no theft and this actually was fabricated.
And I have evidence, proof, of affidavits in a civil case, that the Institute Harvey & Annette Whittemore filed, illegally. And we responded to that on November 4th, they had already filed
it with four affidavits that basically frame me up for stealing these things.
...Now an institute that an institute that commits misappropriation of federal funds and medicare fraud, selling an unvalidated diagnostic test knowingly, and taking reagents out of the lab, and paying personnel who haven't worked in the lab... That kind of an institute wouldn't retain a principal investigators grant, unless of course there was a reason to pay them for their crimes..."
Swann:
"So I've been through a lot of this personally myself, I understand exactly where you're coming from. But I also think it's important as we talk about this to help viewers to understand what this tactic is, so that they can also learn how to recognize it.
Because you are not the first and you won't be the last person that this happens to. There's a very clear playbook, and how it how it all plays out: one is the articles, right, these articles all appear at the exact same time, they all show up being published at the same time in the usual suspects--Daily Beasts, Crooks and Liars, New York Times, Wall Street Journal...
They'll all suddenly pop up with the same articles on them. They'll call themselves 'fact checks', but they don't actually check the facts of anything you say.
One thing that I have learned over the years is that when these attacks come you can usually find why they're coming by looking at the one issue that they won't discuss.
So all the attacks that they'll bring against you and all the things they'll say about you... but what are the issues that you mention that they stay far far away from? They never even come up, because it's almost as if they're terrified of those becoming a part of the public consciousness.
I consider myself to be a journalist who knows a lot about a lot
of things, and one of the things I did not know until your interview was how many people working in the public sector who work for organizations like the NIH and the CDC have the ability to patent a drug and then have the ability to shape the actual policies--like Anthony Fauci is every day--of the country toward the the profit that he can make from royalties from that drug.
And I thought the fact that you brought this up, this is so critically important that I truly believe it's part of the reason there's been such a vigorous attack against your character and this attempt to slander you.
Share with us how important of an issue is this moving forward for people to understand the conflict of interest here."
Mikovits:
"Oh, it's the single most important thing at every level the journals, the grant, the funding...So you don't get a job if you don't have the funding, if you don't publish in the journals who are controlling the message, and if you don't give these talks, you don't get the patent, and you shouldn't have the patent.
Universities who are funded by NIH shouldn't have patents,
and that's when these conflicts changed, was the 1983/4r Bayh–Dole Act, the senator from Utah, Bayh, and Bob Dole.
That changed everything, and it did the drug costs we wouldn't be experiencing anywhere near the drug costs the patents are on things, as you said Tony Fauci steering toward (inaudible), when we have when we have solutions that are 70 year old drugs that cost pennies on the dollar.
And including other immune therapies that could prevent these diseases from ever happening.
So our entire government is steering towards where you can't make label claims for simple vitamin C, or supplements that cost nothing and driving everything towards drugs. And they have the patents."Uploaded by Bew Swann May 15, 2020, here:
https://youtu.be/QFAOlCUs8mY
Ben Swann on the character assassinations of her (much like those of us who stood for Syria endured for years), to discredit her--something I'm intimately familiar with, having endured the same over the years, including the wiki-smear entry...
Dr. Mikovits:
"...What I was actually arrested for was written in Science, the journal. Basically it said that I was arrested on felony charges of being a fugitive from justice. But it went on to say that nobody issued a warrant, whether either Washoe County, Reno, Sparks...
Nobody in Nevada where the institute I worked with was. Nobody in Ventura, the police who actually arrested me. No warrant my house was thoroughly searched, my friend's house was thoroughly searched, and nothing was found. So there never was a charge on to base the fugitive from justice felony charge.
I was held in jail for five days, on no bail, with no attorney, so with no judge, against every due process. As I said, my house was searched without a warrant, there was no property, there was no theft and this actually was fabricated.
And I have evidence, proof, of affidavits in a civil case, that the Institute Harvey & Annette Whittemore filed, illegally. And we responded to that on November 4th, they had already filed
it with four affidavits that basically frame me up for stealing these things.
...Now an institute that an institute that commits misappropriation of federal funds and medicare fraud, selling an unvalidated diagnostic test knowingly, and taking reagents out of the lab, and paying personnel who haven't worked in the lab... That kind of an institute wouldn't retain a principal investigators grant, unless of course there was a reason to pay them for their crimes..."
Swann:
"So I've been through a lot of this personally myself, I understand exactly where you're coming from. But I also think it's important as we talk about this to help viewers to understand what this tactic is, so that they can also learn how to recognize it.
Because you are not the first and you won't be the last person that this happens to. There's a very clear playbook, and how it how it all plays out: one is the articles, right, these articles all appear at the exact same time, they all show up being published at the same time in the usual suspects--Daily Beasts, Crooks and Liars, New York Times, Wall Street Journal...
They'll all suddenly pop up with the same articles on them. They'll call themselves 'fact checks', but they don't actually check the facts of anything you say.
One thing that I have learned over the years is that when these attacks come you can usually find why they're coming by looking at the one issue that they won't discuss.
So all the attacks that they'll bring against you and all the things they'll say about you... but what are the issues that you mention that they stay far far away from? They never even come up, because it's almost as if they're terrified of those becoming a part of the public consciousness.
I consider myself to be a journalist who knows a lot about a lot
of things, and one of the things I did not know until your interview was how many people working in the public sector who work for organizations like the NIH and the CDC have the ability to patent a drug and then have the ability to shape the actual policies--like Anthony Fauci is every day--of the country toward the the profit that he can make from royalties from that drug.
And I thought the fact that you brought this up, this is so critically important that I truly believe it's part of the reason there's been such a vigorous attack against your character and this attempt to slander you.
Share with us how important of an issue is this moving forward for people to understand the conflict of interest here."
Mikovits:
"Oh, it's the single most important thing at every level the journals, the grant, the funding...So you don't get a job if you don't have the funding, if you don't publish in the journals who are controlling the message, and if you don't give these talks, you don't get the patent, and you shouldn't have the patent.
Universities who are funded by NIH shouldn't have patents,
and that's when these conflicts changed, was the 1983/4r Bayh–Dole Act, the senator from Utah, Bayh, and Bob Dole.
That changed everything, and it did the drug costs we wouldn't be experiencing anywhere near the drug costs the patents are on things, as you said Tony Fauci steering toward (inaudible), when we have when we have solutions that are 70 year old drugs that cost pennies on the dollar.
And including other immune therapies that could prevent these diseases from ever happening.
So our entire government is steering towards where you can't make label claims for simple vitamin C, or supplements that cost nothing and driving everything towards drugs. And they have the patents."
5-17-2020