YT

A few years ago when I had first been introduced to philosophy, I was reading about illusions as an argument against naïve realism. The author presented the argument as a simple one: in illusions, someone perceives some object having some property 'F', although it does not "really" have this property. Therefore, that person must be perceiving the object indirectly. The argument is a fairly convincing one, and certainly raises a big enough issue to make the naïve realist to reconsider their pos...