Hegel
May 10, 2023•1,706 words
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770 - 1831)
Life
- Early Life
- Born 1770 in Stuttgart
- Son of a revenue officer
- Early education at the Stuttgart grammar school until 18
- 1788: Studied classics and philosophy in Tübingen for 2 years
- He was impatient with the orthodoxy of his teachers, and his certificate shows that, while dedicated to philosophy, less proficient in theology
- Was said to be a poor orator
- Career
- Wanting to study philosophy of Greek literature, he became a private tutor
- Lived in Berne for three years with free time and access to a library
- Reads Gibbon’s work on the fall of the Roman Empire and Charles Louis, baron de Montesquieu’s De l’esprit des loix
- Studied Immanuel Kant, whose essay on religion inspired his early theological writings that were published after his death
- End of 1786: Moves to Frankfurt am Main, his friend Hölderlin secured him a tutorship
- Hegel suffered from melancholia and worked to cure himself: especially with Greek philosophy, modern history, and politics
- After this, he diverges from Kantianism
- Professor and lecturer at several Prussian universities
- Traveled across Europe
- Aims
- Make philosophy more accessible to the world
- Develop a system to explain the historical development of the world (the Dialectic method)
Philosophy
Religion
- Kant’s view
- Orthodoxy requires a faith in historical facts and doctrines reason alone cannot justify
- It imposes a moral system of arbitrary commands
- Jesus had taught a rational morality
- Emancipation
- Accepted this teaching, but was more of a historian
- Writes two essays: the life of Jesus interpreted on Kantian lines and the second on how Christianity had became authoritarian when the teachings of Christ were not authoritarian but rationalistic
- Did not attack theology, but orthodox - inspired by a doctrine of the Holy Spirit
- Faith in reason, with its religious bias
- More of a Historian than Kant, he revested his early work
- Der Geist des Christentums und sein Schicksal (The Spirit of Christianity and Its Fate)
- Negative view on Judaism, saw them as slaves to the Mosaic Law
- Lives were unlovely compared to ancient Greeks, they were materialist
- Jesus taught humans were not to be slaves of objective commands, but the law is to be theirs
- God’s will should be wholeheartedly and single-mindedly carried out
- It is a community, without tension, that is the Kingdom of God
- This is the teaching of Christ, founded on a belief of the unity of the divine and human
- Humans have spirit, and therefore can understand the Spirit of God, but are still flesh
- His philosophy is rooted in these ideas
Freedom and right
- Philosophy of Right (PR) 1821
- Existence of right is presupposed from his philosophical system
- Rights are the existence of free will
- Philosophy of right is necessarily a philosophy of freedom
- Believed our comprehension of right was through the stages of Abstract Right, Morality, and Ethical Life
- Abstract Right (Property)
- Intended as a ground to establish what constitutes free will
- Property in this stage develops self-consciousness
- Ownership of property is determined within the context of a common will between people
- This mutual recognition about property ownership is named contract
- Abstract Right is a hypothetical space of two persons, there is no exchange or money or sale
- It is not written
- Only the free will of an individual can ground the free will of another
- Abstract (Punishments)
- Three kinds of wrong
- Unintentional
- Individuals are adhering to what they have mutually recognized, one is unwittingly incorrect
- Unpunishable: both sides see the recognition of right as the universal and deciding factor
- Deception
- Both parties claim to appeal to right, one does so insincerely
- More serious than unintentional
- Crime
- No appeal to right
- Denies an appeal to right
- Threat to mutual recognition, one partly acts regardless of right
- It is an infringement of right, of mutual recognition
- Punishment
- The restoration of right for a crime
- Theft sends a message to the thief and wider community that this crime should not have happened
- Helps restore violated right
- His theory of punishment is retributivist
- Critical of deterrence and rehabilitation approaches since they take it for granted that punishment in and for itself is just
- There is not judge or jury in Abstract Right to determine justice
- Morality
- moral point of view is an abstract and hypothetical exercise
- Focuses on the individual’s power of choice
- We may intend to do good but our only guide is our individual conception of good
- Criticizes Kant’s Formula of Universal Law: we should only act in accordance with the maxim through which we can use and will become a universal law
- Ethical law
- More concrete and social context
- Discusses institutions of family, civil society, and the state
- Ethical (Family)
- in Ethical Life, family is a sphere where individuals form a bond
- Not arbitrary family is a connection aims at a permanence
- Marriages are not defined in contractual terms, but ethical terms
- More substantive unity is created, since it is a more permanent bond
- Foundation is feelings
- Therefore opposes arranged marriages
- Family achieves unity through creation of children
- Men and women embody different features
- Family is a relation of unity for natural law, creates the pursuit of the individual within the system of needs
- Ethical (Civil Society)
- Place of work and law
- Needs are met by the contribution in the market and natural division of labor
- Described as second family, fosters brotherly love
- Market relations are a foundation for the acquisition by free individuals of social identities including social solidarity
- Ethical (Law)
- Link between morality and law, endorses a variety of natural law
- Law may differ from right
- Something can be lawful but unjust
- Moral standard must proceed application of law
- Understanding of law must be centered on the law itself and not extralegal considerations
- Source of cognition of what is right is what is lawful
- The State
- The state is the source of greater actuality
- Concrete freedom is realized
- Individuals are members of families, civil society, and the state
- State enables individuals to flourish
- Patriotic love towards the state
- Seeks to unify aristocracy, democracy and monarchy
- His state is headed by a hereditary monarch
- Provides unity
- Duty of a monarch was to represent the people, elected politicians are partisan or represent only the views of their voters
- More of a symbolic role
- Criticized UK monarchy since the King did not veto laws
- Representative gov, with cabinet, would provide balance
History
- Dialectic method
- Meant to explain the development of history
- History is the development and evolution of ideas through conflict and confrontation
- Every thesis has an antithesis, the ideas are merged into a synthesis
- Synthesis needs a new antithesis
- Through this confrontation, ideas are improved
- People became freer and wiser: wisdom is freedom
- Example of France
- L’ancien regime: response was the French revolution
- Outcome: Napoleon, the synthesis of the ancien regime and new world
- Subsequent revolutions, second revolution
- Hegel would see this as development of mankind
- Zeitgeist
- The spirit of the age
- We are trapped in the spirit of the time (values, culture, religion)
- It is important to consider the zeitgeist of a period being studied
- Three forms of spirit
- Subjective spirit: spirit, conscious, value system of the individual
- Volksgeist: spirit of the group, their values and will
- Absolute spirit: divine or world spirit, perhaps the final stage of development, world embraces common values, only reachable with the development and enlightenment of all mankind
- Nationalism
- People are untied and connected by common ideas, history, nation, culture
- Theory of recognition: there is a permanent struggle for recognition of their identity and dignity
- Also look for recognition of how their group was victimized
Doctrine of the State
- The state
- Strong state enabled freedom
- It is not a product of the social contract, but a divine product of a conflict
- People are a product of the state
- Perhaps a response to his hectic period (French Rev)
- Romanticism and Enlightenment - he was an idealist
- Transformation (not his ideas)
- fall of l’ancien regime had profound effect
- State needed to bind people together, state needed to become the new religion
- It was guiding, moral, omnipotent authority
- It provides salvation and solutions
- Organization
- Monarch reigned under constitution
- Highly educated civil servants should serve - prevented majority rule
- No power for women
- Democracy leads to anarchism
- Antithesis of state is other states, leads to war
- Fond of war, they lead to progress while peace leads to stagnation
- States went to war more easily in Hegel’s time, it was not as destructive
- “War is simply the continuation of politics by other means” - Von Clauswitz
- Need for the state
- Keep people free
- Strong states will take away freedoms
- Freedom of right of self-determination was his vision of freedom
- Wanted a united German state
- Therefore considered one of the founding fathers of nationalism
Impact
Split
- His students split into right and left, who argued over whether he was conservative or progressive
\
The Phenomenology of Mind
- More popular in the U.S and UK
Karl Marx
- Influenced Marx, who studied and criticized his Philosophy of Mind
- Marx did not like its idealization the Prussian state
- Also inspired Hitler
Nationalism
- Inspired the type of nationalism that created the World Wars, heightened sense of identity
- Some philosophers attribute his work to inspiring totalitarianism in the 20th Century
\