Creation is math?

Let's consider an artist, for example Mozart. He is one of the most well-known artists in the world, and this is influenced by the incredibly rich and cult works he has created. So, did Mozart, who created these works, really "create" them?

Take, for example, Mozart's work “Eine kleine nacht musik”. With what percentage mathematically, can the rhythm and harmony created by the notes in this piece come out of the hands of a person who randomly presses the keys of the piano?

Did Mozart create only one out of a trillion over a trillion different combinations? Or has he discovered a combination that already exists or could exist somewhere in the universe?

From this perspective, Mozart masquerades as an explorer, but why do we call him a creative person?

When we think about it like that, we all become like aspiring explorers in a sea of ​​possibilities, finding or trying to find the combination that pleases our soul.

So there is no such thing as creativity? If everything already exists and has been created, how can you call yourself creative if only you have revealed that created and already existing thing? When you think about it, a truly "creative" work has never been seen before. Aren't all of our works up to now a mixture of what already exists, an inspiration or a reflection of what we see through our own eyes? Ah here it is; "From our own eyes!" I guess that's what reveals everything. Maybe we are looking at this sea "from our own eyes" to reveal a situation that already exists in the sea of ​​possibilities, and so some of us immediately see the soul-pleasing combination. After all, you have to know where to look to find something.

For people like Mozart, then, it shouldn't be wrong to use a definition like "one of those explorers who knows where to look for himself".


You'll only receive email when they publish something new.

More from Walter Write
All posts